|
Manner is concerned with the mechanics of public speaking and presentation of the debating case. Good manner will enhance the argument; bad manner will distract or detract the audience from the argument. The most important thing to remember when you assess manner is to ask the question "Was it effective?"
THE ELEMENTS OF MANNER:
- Vocal style: Volume of delivery should be audible; enunciation should be
clear and plain; pace of delivery should be neither too slow nor too fast; vocal style should have variety and appropriate pauses for relaxation and emphasis; delivery should be reasonably fluent, confident and authoritative (but not arrogant or hectoring).
- Use of language: Speakers should not vary from normal conversational
language; they should beware of the use of slang or jargon of some field of specialty unfamiliar to the audience.
- Use of notes: Notes should be unobtrusive, small enough to be held in
one hand and contain only key words or headlines.
- Use of eyes: Debaters should attempt to make eye contact with the
audience.
- Gesture: Gestures should be natural and appropriate and not laborious
or distracting; mannerisms should be avoided.
- Stance: Speakers may move around or stand still and you should assess
the effectiveness of the stance by whether it aided the argument or distracted you from the argument.
- Dress: Dress may only be taken into account in the assessment of
manner where it is so incongruous that it affects the credibility of the speaker. Impression of sincerity: A more sincere approach will make the speaker more believable and effective.
- Personal attacks on opponents: Derogatory comments will not be
tolerated and will suffer manner penalty as such remarks distract the audience from the argument and also make the speaker lose the sympathetic ear of the audience; speakers should also not refer to the personal convictions held by opposing debaters.
- Humour: Humour should be appropriate and may even be used at a
crucial time in a serious debate.
Adjudicators must note that manner is assessed as the total impact of all its various elements - not as some aggregation of fixed categories according to rigid weightings.
|
|
1. Introduction 2. Assessing Matter 3. Assessing Method 4. Assessing Manner 5. Other Issues 6. Marking Scale 7. Conclusion
|
|